How to write a literature review
A young researcher's guide to a systematic review Editage Insights
Systematic reviews are a type of review that uses repeatable analytical methods to collect secondary data and analyse it. Systematic reviews are a type of evidence synthesis which formulate research questions that are broad or narrow in scope, and identify and synthesize data that directly relate to the systematic review question. Some systematic reviews critically appraise research studies, and synthesize findings qualitatively or quantitatively. For example, systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials are an important way of informing evidence-based medicine ,  and a review of existing studies is often quicker and cheaper than embarking on a new study. While systematic reviews are often applied in the biomedical or healthcare context, they can be used in other areas where an assessment of a precisely defined subject would be helpful. An understanding of systematic reviews and how to implement them in practice is highly recommended for professionals involved in the delivery of health care , public health and public policy. Systematic reviews can be used to inform decision making in many different disciplines, such as evidence-based healthcare and evidence-based policy and practice.
A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data
Librarians can be heavily involved in the evidence synthesis process, however it is recommended that the disciplinary experts on the author team manage certain steps that require specific content-area and quantitative methods expertise. Librarians who write the search methodology section of the synthesis should be included as a co-author. The following tabs describe each evidence synthesis step in more detail, as well as provide resources and guidance.
Systematic literature reviews are an increasingly used review methodology to synthesize the existing body of literature in a field. However, editors complain about a high number of desk rejections because of a lack in quality. Poorly developed review articles are not published because of a perceived lack of contribution to the field. Our article supports authors of standalone papers and graduate students in the Entrepreneurship domain to write contribution-focused systematic reviews e. Our article analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of a systematic literature review and how they can be overcome.